The Only Specialized Global Intellectual Property News Agency
A Member of Talal Abu-Ghazaleh Global

Rovi Provides an Update on Ongoing Litigation

16-Jul-2015 | Source : Rovi Corporation | Visits : 7143
SANTA CLARA, Calif - Rovi Corporation today provided an update on ongoing litigation against Netflix, Inc. ("Netflix").

Rovi has been engaged in litigation against Netflix with respect to five patents related to various features and functionality provided by the over-the-top (OTT) video service.
According to Rovi, on July 15, 2015, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton issued a ruling granting Netflix’s motion for summary judgment on the five patents at issue in the current litigation, finding the patents invalid on the grounds that they are not directed to patentable subject matter based upon the Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International. As a result, the Court has entered judgment in favor of Netflix in the case.
Samir Armaly, Rovi’s executive vice president of intellectual property and licensing, said, “While we are pleased that the Court sided with Rovi on the key claim construction issues, we are disappointed in, and strongly disagree with, the Court’s decision finding the five patents invalid and plan to appeal that decision.”
“Additionally,” Mr. Armaly added, “it is important to remember that this litigation, initiated by Netflix, was filed in 2011, more than two years before the Supreme Court issued the Alice ruling on patentable subject matter. It is also important to remember that only five patents from our portfolio were at issue in this case, and Rovi’s US patent portfolio includes more than 1,500 issued patents and pending applications. We are committed to enforcing our intellectual property against Netflix until the necessary licenses are in place. As we do so, we will be selecting patents from our diverse patent portfolio with the benefit of having the Alice decision and its reasoning factored into that patent selection.”
As part of the decision, Judge Hamilton also issued a claim construction ruling in the case in which the Court construed the nine disputed claim terms in the case. The Court ruled in Rovi’s favor on nearly all of the disputed claim terms, only adopting Netflix’s proposed construction of a single term. Importantly, the Court rejected attempts by Netflix to limit the scope of the patents to the area of “broadcast television,” noting that the claims contain no such limitations and the patents refer to other types of media. Furthermore, the Court rejected attempts by Netflix to limit the scope of the patents to set-top box implementations.
Mr. Armaly continued, “Other leading OTT providers, including Apple, Google and Hulu, have previously taken a license under the Rovi patent portfolio, and we remain confident that Netflix requires a similar license. While our litigation continues against Netflix, we intend to continue to grow our leading entertainment discovery patent licensing program, including with upcoming renewals in the US Pay-TV market. Although litigation is always an inherent part of any licensing program, Rovi’s licensing program has been built over the past decade without having to rely on courtroom victories for success. We expect that to continue in the future with the vast majority of our agreements resulting from normal commercial negotiations. Our recent renewal with Charter, covering both set-top-box and second screen video platforms, is an example of one such agreement.”
Rovi is leading the way to a more personalized entertainment experience. The company’s pioneering guides, metadata and recommendations continue to drive program search and navigation on millions of devices across the globe. 

Related Articles